Sport as Theatre
6A teary eyed and shocked AB de Villiers walked slowly into the Press Conference 15 minutes after his side had been knocked out of the Cricket World Cup. The second question he fielded was from a South African journalist.
“Do you think that when you dropped the ball in going for the run out you cost your side the World Cup?”
There was an awkward silence.
“Many things can go right or wrong in a match like that, and there were many moments tonight. But if you want to run the line that I am solely to blame then I’m happy to wear that responsibility.”
It was an extraordinarily classy response to a brutal question asked in bad taste. And he was right; a game like that has several crucial moments, and a match like last night’s, given its closeness throughout, provided more than its fair share.
This was a match played between two very good, but not perfect sides. Neither had made a World Cup final before, and it was being played in front of a deafening crowd of over 40,000. With that for a backdrop there will always be mistakes; forced or otherwise.
The South African innings was not without its drama, and remember New Zealand themselves dropped four catches of varying difficulty. But it is always the big moments later in an ODI that will get the focus; despite the fact that it was tense throughout.
The Recent Theory.
298 off 43 overs was always going to be a difficult yet possible chase given the varying facts of the way New Zealand had batted to date, the hostility of the South African bowling and Eden Park’s idiosyncrasies.
The theatre was immediate, with McCullum launching into Steyn. Two of the greatest players of their generation in a match of this significance gong toe-to-toe in potentially their last World Cups. The over that went for 25 raised the tension levels; this was officially all on. A tattooed fueled bravado battle, and NZ was back in the game.
From there the plot swayed one way and the other with neither side really getting themselves into a position of dominance. The Guptill run out came at a time when the hosts were starting to impose themselves; that was one of those mistakes. With the stakes high, players will take risks, and that leads to error.
The de Villiers let off was another one of these, as was Quintin de Kock’s similar fumble a few overs later.
Corey Anderson, who had shown real composure given the surroundings then got frustrated and holed out, tipping the balance in the favour of the Proteas. Even then it was not to be straight forward. He would stand on the boundary rope for five minutes as the umpires checked to see whether the ball had touched the annoyingly intrusive Spider Cam ropes. And people say an X-Factor elimination is drawn out suspense.
Then there was the collision between the two fieldsmen on the boundary; one of whom was a substitute and its criticality given the batsman was Elliott. That had an element of the Klusener / Donald situation in 1999 but that can be brought about by the apprehension of the moment.
And then the curtain call; a classic Daniel Vettori nibbled four, followed by a six from Grant Elliott which ignited a crescendo of noise that lasted a good ten minutes. Grant Elliott; a shock selection for some, scoring the winning runs in a Cricket Would Cup semi-final.
This was eight hours of high quality tension with numerous battles within the battle. There were several significant moments throughout the match and the result was not known until the penultimate ball. That is sport at its best, that is theatre, and that is what we love about it.
AB de Villiers was not the only person with teary eyes last night.
[…] the theatre of yesterday it almost seems wrong to allocate MVP points, but it was started (against South Africa as it […]
I live in Florida but raised on cricket in the Caribbean. Here only paying ESPN $100 were you able to view any cricket. I was glued to Cricinfo to get the ball by ball story using my imagination to conjure up the rest. I didn’t see the emotion of the South African players but the days ensuing showed it to me through various media.
Yes I was ecstatic New Zealand won, I have a tremendous crush on the Captain, but I even though I would make allowances for the South African ” journalist” who asked such a hurtful question, the quality of first the man, and then the cricket raised status of AB Devilliers in anyone’s book. But it was a nasty attack on a man who shed tears and did battle for his country. Can the journalist say the same?
299
NZ scored 299 to win a World Cup semi-final at Eden Park.
Could it be more symbolic?
299 marked another milestone in NZ cricket until just over a year ago. Its remarkable – especially given Martin Crowe was out in 1992 injured; here, he’s unwell.
[…] For the first time since 2004, when the Pakistani cameramen were on strike, the New Zealand cricket team is playing international matches, and they are not being screened here. Rubbing salt into that wound is the fact they are being screened in Australia and Britain. All this at a time when the fortunes of the national side are unusually high, and when the previous meeting between the two sides in March was rather memorable. […]
[…] Then there was that semi-final. […]
[…] This […]